But the disadvantage of this direction of mind was not confined to knowledge and mental production;it extended to action and feeling.We know that the sensibility of the mind depends,as to degree,on the liveliness,and for extent on the richness of the imagination.Now the predominance of the faculty of analysis must necessarily deprive the imagination of its warmth and energy,and a restricted sphere of objects must diminish its wealth.It is for this reason that the abstract thinker has very often a cold heart,because he analyses impressions,which only move the mind by their combination or totality;on the other hand,the man of business,the statesman,has very often a narrow heart,because shut up in the narrow circle of his employment his imagination can neither expand nor adapt itself to another manner of viewing things.
My subject has led me naturally to place in relief the distressing tendency of the character of our own times to show the sources of the evil,without its being my province to point out the compensations offered by nature.
I will readily admit to you that,although this splitting up of their being was unfavourable for individuals,it was the only road open for the progress of the race.The point at which we see humanity arrived among the Greeks was undoubtedly a maximum;it could neither stop there nor rise higher.
It could not stop there,for the sum of notions acquired forced infallibly the intelligence to break with feeling and intuition,and to lead to clearness of knowledge.Nor could it rise any higher;for it is only in a determinate measure that clearness can be reconciled with a certain degree of abundance and of warmth.The Greeks had attained this measure,and to continue their progress in culture,they,as we,were obliged to renounce the totality of their being,and to follow different and separate roads in order to seek after truth.
There was no other way to develop the manifold aptitudes of man than to bring them in opposition with one another.This antagonism of forces is the great instrument of culture,but it is only an instrument;for as long as this antagonism lasts,man is only on the road to culture.It is only because these special forces are isolated in man,and because they take on themselves to impose an exclusive legislation,that they enter into strife with the truth of things,and oblige common sense,which generally adheres imperturbably to external phaenomena,to dive into the essence of things.While pure understanding usurps authority in the world of sense,and empiricism attempts to subject this intellect to the conditions of experience,these two rival directions arrive at the highest possible development,and exhaust the whole extent of their sphere.While on the one hand imagination,by its tyranny,ventures to destroy the order of the world,it forces reason,on the other side,to rise up to the supreme sources of knowledge,and to invoke against this predominance of fancy the help of the law of necessity.
By an exclusive spirit in the case of his faculties,the individual is fatally led to error;but the species is led to truth.It is only by gathering up all the energy of our mind in a single focus,and concentrating a single force in our being,that we give in some sort wings to this isolated force,and that we draw it on artificially far beyond the limits that nature seems to have imposed upon it.If it be certain that all human individuals taken together would never have arrived,with the visual power given them by nature,to see a satellite of Jupiter,discovered by the telescope of the astronomer,it is just as well established that never would the human understanding have produced the analysis of the infinite,or the critique of pure reason,if in particular branches,destined for this mission,reason had not applied itself to special researches,and if,after having,as it were,freed itself from all matter,it had not by the most powerful abstraction given to the spiritual eye of man the force necessary,in order to look into the absolute.But the question is,if a spirit thus absorbed in pure reason and intuition will be able to emancipate itself from the rigorous fetters of logic,to take the free action of poetry,and seize the individuality of things with a faithful and chaste sense?Here nature imposes even on the most universal genius a limit it cannot pass,and truth will make martyrs as long as philosophy will be reduced to make its principal occupation the search for arms against errors.
But whatever may be the final profit for the totality of the world,of this distinct and special perfecting of the human faculties,it cannot be denied that this final aim of the universe,which devotes them to this kind of culture,is a cause of suffering,and a kind of malediction for individuals.I admit that the exercises of the gymnasium form athletic bodies;but beauty is only developed by the free and equal play of the limbs.In the same way the tension of the isolated spiritual forces may make extraordinary men;but it is only the well-tempered equilibrium of these forces that can produce happy and accomplished men.And in what relation should we be placed with past and future ages if the perfecting of human nature made such a sacrifice indispensable?In that case we should have been the slaves of humanity,we should have consumed our forces in servile work for it during some thousands of years,and we should have stamped on our humiliated,mutilated nature the shameful brand of this slavery -all this in order that future generations,in a happy leisure,might consecrate themselves to the cure of their moral health,and develop the whole of human nature by their free culture.
But can it be true that man has to neglect himself for any end whatever?
Can nature snatch from us,for any end whatever,the perfection which is prescribed to us by the aim of reason?It must be false that the perfecting of particular faculties renders the sacrifice of their totality necessary;and even if the law of nature had imperiously this tendency,we must have the power to reform by a superior art this totality of our being,which art has destroyed.
