登陆注册
10806300000003

第3章

Preface

BY ALISA MALINOVICH

In the summer of 1992, Anton Mueller at Grove/Atlantic met with my mother to suggest an idea for a book proposal he was excited about. He'd been thinking, he explained, about the extraordinary differences between the lives of his grandmother, mother, and sister, and he envisioned a book that would capture-through a collection of narratives-how American women's lives have changed over the past century. Intrigued by the idea but hesitant to undertake a task of such breadth while remaining committed to her work on violence prevention (her first book had been out just over a year and she was busy lecturing and writing on the topic), my mother considered the possibility of my coauthoring the book with her. After all, she thought, it would make perfect sense for a mother and daughter to embark on this project together. I'd bring a different perspective to it, and the youngest women might feel more comfortable with and be able to open up more easily to me.

I remember standing in the kitchen of my mother's apartment, thinking about what an amazing opportunity it would be. Of course, the idea of entering into a long-term project with my mother in the dawn of my twentieth year sent a vague wave of anxiety rippling through my chest. I was on the brink of adulthood, and these years were supposed to be (this part always makes my mother laugh) the time to "individuate." But I am blessed with a mother who, for as long as I can remember, has taken me seriously as a person and as a writer. I believe it is that faith in and respect of me that (despite undeniable moments of panicked claustrophobia) carried our successful partnership through.

The project had immediate appeal and made sense to me: My summer job was that of kindercamp counselor at the Westside YMCA in Manhattan (a place that reflected the world I'd grown up in), and indeed I'd been struck by the enormous changes that had taken place since my own childhood. Working mothers were now the norm, and nannies and fathers were major presences in the drop-off/pick-up scene (though dads were generally seen doing morning drop-offs on their way to work). The landscape felt radically different from the sea of moms I remembered dropping us off and picking us up in the mid to late seventies.

At the same time that I was interested in finding out more about the changes that had taken place in my own world, I was excited about the prospect of interviewing women whose lives and backgrounds were very different from my own. I can remember performing in my summer camp's version of the feminist musical Free to Be You and Me as a ten-or eleven-year-old child and hearing my mother complain about the way the mail always came addressed to "Dr. and Mrs." (she'd earned her doctorate years before my father earned his). All my life I'd been surrounded by people who were familiar with feminism, and although I'm sure I also spent time with people who weren't, we never discussed the subject, so that the difference wasn't revealed to me. I'll never forget my surprise when, at the end of an interview, I asked a seventeen-year-old girl in the Bronx what feminism meant to her, and she responded by saying, "Feminist? I think it means you're feminine. Nice, polite, sitting proper. More of a girl than a tomboy." I felt sort of like Dorothy in The Wizard of Oz-"Toto, I don't think we're in Kansas anymore."

My mother and I didn't attempt a scientific study or a random sampling of American women, but we were committed to achieving diversity with regard to race and ethnicity, class, and sexual orientation. We wanted to interview women in different parts of the country and in a wide range of professions. We also thought it would be interesting to trace women's experiences in certain careers through the century, and we therefore interviewed doctors, nurses, and lawyers in each generation. At the same time we were not looking for women with any particular experiences. We did not seek out women who had been raped or abused, just as we did not seek out women who had been happily married.

Only toward the very end of the project, in an effort to fill in some historical gaps, did we choose fewer than ten women based on specific stories that we wanted them to tell. Among them were Sybil Jordan Hampton, who told of her experiences as one of the first black students at Little Rock Central High School; Linda Pesso, who spoke about her life as a wartime bride and suburban homemaker in the 1950s; and Robin Vaccai-Yess, who described high-tech birthing in the 1990s.

The agreement from the start was that I would interview the bulk of the younger women, and my mother would do the remainder. I ended up doing between a quarter and a third of the book and-for reasons that made practical sense-we both occasionally crossed over into each other's age group. We interviewed women in the rural and urban Northeast, and although we made separate trips to places that included Colorado and the Washington, D.C., area, we did the major traveling for the book together. Our first big trip was out west, where we both interviewed women in Southern California. My mother continued up north, while I caught a plane back to New England to start my junior year of college.

The following summer we flew to Louisiana, and from there we rented a car, driving north with stops along the way. Being the northerners (and New Yorkers) that we are, we were quite excited to reach the Mississippi border, and we stopped the car on the side of the road to take pictures at the state line. The South was intriguing in many ways, and, despite warnings we'd gotten about southerners being wary of northerners and especially writer-types from New York, we found the southern women we interviewed and the many people who helped us to be across-the-board friendly and open.

The geographic diversity of the women interviewed was amplified by the fact that many women had moved one or several times during their lifetime. A young woman in Michigan (our final destination) described her childhood in New Jersey; an older woman in California described her courtship in Indiana. In addition, we conducted a number of telephone interviews with women in places we did not travel to.

To find the broad range of women we were interested in interviewing, we networked in lots of different ways. I handed out flyers to supermarket cashiers. A friend of mine leafleted the mailboxes of students in her department at college. My mother contacted a friend who runs a marketing research firm and obtained permission to call women who had been in focus groups. To begin finding women down south, we began with three -major contacts and watched them grow like the branches of a tree-the head of a nonprofit organization put us in touch with five women on his board, and they in turn provided us with access to countless others; a New York City friend put us in touch with a southern relative of hers who led us to several of his women friends; a young woman who had spent a couple of years as a student in Louisiana gave us the number of a well-connected friend who still lived in the area. Each potential interviewee was a potential resource, and thanks to the combined effort of so many people, we wound up with a diverse group of women who had many stories to tell.

The older women were asked to focus largely on their younger days rather than on their present lives, so that their experiences as young and middle-aged women could be compared with the experiences of young and middle-aged women in later years. We ultimately conceived of the women interviewed as spanning three generations. The first generation, born from 1900 to the early 1930s, was-except for the fact that it often influenced their thinking and altered the course of many of their children's and grandchildren's lives-the least affected by the late twentieth century women's movement. The second generation, born from the mid 1930s to the early 1950s, was old enough to have developed to a significant extent before the movement, but young enough to have their lives -affected by it. And the third generation, born from the mid-1950s to the mid-1970s, is essentially post–women's movement. The oldest of them came of age in its heyday.

Of course, in the end, space limitations did not allow for every woman interviewed to appear in the book. It was hard to put fascinating material aside. We can only share our disappointment with the women whose stories do not appear here and offer our assurance that they enriched our understanding. Analysis in the introduction is based on all of the interviews conducted, and in some cases women whose stories do not appear in the body of the book are quoted there.

I learned so much, in so many ways, from the experience of conducting these interviews. It was an exercise in self-restraint to sit with a person for one or two or four hours and listen to her relay experiences and share opinions to which I could not respond. Often I held back the impulse to bounce back with an experience of my own that related to hers or to question an assumption that she made. But in holding back my own responses, I am quite sure that I learned more than I would have from a dialogue of equal length. For the women knew that they were being listened to, not judged, and that it was my intention to hear their experiences and their opinions out, not to respond to or comment on them. In the end I learned a tolerance and surprised myself with the extent to which I could understand where virtually all of the women-some of whom might have been my friends in "real life" and others of whom I would probably never have crossed paths with-were coming from.

There are, of course, those who are unreachable, and when I think of the women I interviewed, I always remember one who turned me away saying, "My life is too horrible to talk about." When we do oral history, we present the stories of those who are willing to tell them, and it seems important to consider the impact that has on who is represented. In the end these women inspired and taught me things. They were open and trusting, and I was amazed at the energy and perseverance that so many of them had in the face of incredible hardship. I can see all of their faces in my mind, and I remember the worlds that they drew me into. There's a sort of magic that happens when you put on the tape recorder and allow someone to talk-their words so often come out like poetry and teach us things that we may already know, but that so often, we forget to remember. I hope that some of that magic is transmitted in the pages to come.

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 浴血凰唳愿来生错过

    浴血凰唳愿来生错过

    她是受千夫所指的血族少主,他是令万生倾服的星辰之子。他们命中注定不能共存。他初见她:“你额间的花美的张扬。”她冷笑:“嗜血之花,自然张扬。”她从记事起就背负着仇恨,他出生的夜群星璀璨,恰巧那日血浴花遍布了断生崖,山崖之内,只有一片血腥。“既然你我从这里相识,那么今日,一切便从这里结束吧。”她的目光冰冷,他只是苦笑,任凭冰冷的剑端刺进他的心脏。“抱歉,杀了我,放下仇恨活下去,好不好?”她眼中的杀戮被冲淡,最终长剑从手中坠落。她怎么忍心伤害他。或许从一开始,他们的相遇就是一场过错。彼此都曾庆幸能够遇到对方,但此刻,惟愿错过。
  • 我真的想封神

    我真的想封神

    随便撮合一对,造就了百世夫妻,天降功德,月老蒙圈,这是抢饭碗吗?随便劝劝龙王吃熟食之后,又是天降功德,天道有缺这么严重?……封神开启,西方教主讲出那句“此人/物与我教有缘”的名言之后。无论是谁,撒腿就跑,只留下教主风中凌乱~申公豹悠哉悠哉开口:“道友请留步!”之后。脾气好点的,呸他一脸之后直接遁走,脾气暴躁点的,二话不说转身祭起法器就打!……为啥?因为猪脚都坑过了啊!不信你问问哪吒,被坑的都早产了都!嗯嗯!这是一个自己为了能封神,拼命坑人坑神的封神坑王驾到的故事。
  • 余生有你刚好

    余生有你刚好

    某天,李楚窈问周跳跳,“你说你哥当初为什么选我?”周跳跳笨手笨脚的在李楚窈头上编了个巨丑的麻花辫,话不过脑子的回答,“大概是因为你跟我一样不学无术,没有野心,好拿捏。”周厉走近抬手给了周跳跳一个暴栗,也不知打的是她说的话还是她在李楚窈头上搞的小动作。然而不久后,却是周厉亲手教会她商场里的尔虞我诈。--情节虚构,请勿模仿
  • 追妻无门:女boss不好惹

    追妻无门:女boss不好惹

    青涩蜕变,如今她是能独当一面的女boss,爱了冷泽聿七年,也同样花了七年时间去忘记他。以为是陌路,他突然向他表白,扬言要娶她,她只当他是脑子抽风,他的殷勤她也全都无视。他帮她查她父母的死因,赶走身边情敌,解释当初拒绝她的告别,和故意对她冷漠都是无奈之举。突然爆出她父母的死居然和冷家有丝毫联系,还莫名跳出个公爵未婚夫,扬言要与她履行婚约。峰回路转,破镜还能重圆吗? PS:我又开新文了,每逢假期必书荒,新文《有你的世界遇到爱》,喜欢我的文的朋友可以来看看,这是重生类现言,对这个题材感兴趣的一定要收藏起来。
  • 刺客信条之寻仇

    刺客信条之寻仇

    我就是个胆小鬼,眼睁睁的看见亲人被活活烧死,我自己却无能为力,上帝在哪里?总有一天我要把痛苦全部还给你们两个!
  • 先婚后爱,宠妻甜如蜜

    先婚后爱,宠妻甜如蜜

    “顾念繁,我不爱你,滚开!”五年前的话仿佛回响在耳边,字字戳心,顾念繁轻笑,呵,帝锦御,老子早就不稀罕你的爱了,给老子滚开到了夜晚,面对爬床的某人,顾念繁不客气的一脚,当天夜晚,某人气急败坏地压着顾念繁:“怎么骂我打我都行,不许踹我下床!”“行!”顾念繁微微一笑,一巴掌青亮亮地扇在某人脸上,“你~~~”“是你自己说的,随便打,怎么,后悔了?”某人握住顾念繁双手,“疼吗?下次别用手打,你疼手我疼心~”当初伤害她,是他这辈子最错误的选择,所以帝锦御发誓:劳资要用余生追媳妇儿~狗仔:怎么追?帝锦御:床下靠宠,床上靠哄
  • 斗罗之杀神斗罗

    斗罗之杀神斗罗

    穿越斗罗世界,林诚在最恐怖血腥的杀戮之都度过了地狱般的十二年。终于在某一天,他觉醒了杀戮武魂,每杀一个敌人,都能强化自己的能力,无限变强。于是,这片大陆迎来了一个血色的传说。杀魂兽,夺极致属性,狂暴肉身力量。杀魂师,夺武魂特性,提升魂力等级。杀神灵,夺不朽神魂,强化永恒生命。除此之外,每提升一个大等级,杀戮武魂都会觉醒一个特性。第一特性:追魂;第二特性:夜幕;第三特性:流血。第四特性、第五特性、第六特性……待到林诚提升到封号斗罗级别,连神都杀给你看。
  • 隋辽余孽

    隋辽余孽

    身负血海深仇亡国亡家的前朝遗孤,却当了现今王朝的地方大员。深仇大恨难得一报,却爱上了仇家的女子。孤苦伶仃却深得同情,手段通天然受尽世人排挤。事与愿违,矛盾自我。终究要如何选择,做人要如何取舍?一切的一切,都开始于多年前的那个恐怖的日子……
  • 最牛掌门养成记

    最牛掌门养成记

    十万年前,飞仙宗睥睨天下。十万年后,飞仙宗风雨飘摇。为了宗门复兴,唐十三负重前行。路漫漫其修远兮,吾将上下而求索!书友群:230055869
  • 仙宛

    仙宛

    不存在于过去与未来,顾小夕是一个新的转折点。与乱古大帝的输死拼搏中顾小夕意外的处于假死状态,神魂漂泊万年来到天元大陆……