[25]Hargittai，E.（2007）.“Whose space？Differences among users and non‐users of social network sites”.Journal of computer‐Mediated communication，13（1）.
[26]Krueger，Cody，&Peckham（2006）.“Bridging and Bonding in Cyberspace？The Impact of Online communities on Social Capital and Political Participa-tion.”Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Sci-ence Association，Marriott，Loews Philadelphia，and the Pennsylvania Con-vention Center，Philadelphia，PA，Aug31，2006，http://www.allacadem-ic.commetap152576_index.html.
[27]Kyung‐Hee Kim，Haejin Yun（2007）.“Cying for Me，Cying for Us：Rela-tional Dialectics in a Korean Social Network Site.”Journal of computer‐Me-diated communication，13（1）：298‐318.
[28]Lin，Nan.（1994）.“Action，Social Resources，and the Emergence of Social Structure：A Rational Choice Theory.”Advances in Group Process，11：67‐85.
[29]Liu，H.，Maes，P.（2005）.“Interes tmap：Harvesting social network pro-files for recommendations”.Beyond Personalization‐IUI2005，January9，San Diego，California，USA.
[30]Liu，Hugo，Maes，Pattie，and Davenport，Glorianna.（2006）.“Unraveling the taste fabric of social networks.”International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems，2（1），42‐71.
[31]Milgram，S.&Travers，J.（1969）.Experimental Study of Small World Problem.In Sociometry，32（4）.
[32]Narayan，Deepa.，&Michael F.Cassidy.（2001）.“A Dimensional Ap-proach to Measuring Social Capital：Development and Validation of a SocialCapital Inventory.”Current Sociology，Vol.49（2）：59‐102.
[33]Nie，N.H.（2001）.“Sociability，interpersonal relations，and the Internet：Reconciling conflicting findings”.American Behavioral Scientist，45（3），420‐35.
[34]Norris，P.（2001）.Digital divide：Civic engagement，in formation pover-ty，and the Internet worldwide.New York：Cambridge University Press.
[35]Ports，A.（1998）.”Social Capital：It's Origins and Applications in Modem Sociology”.Annual Review of Sociology，24（1）：1‐24.
[36]Putnam，R.D.，Leonardo，R.Nanetti，R.Y.（1993），Making Democracy Work：Civic Traditions in Modern Italy.Princeton University Press Prince-ton，NJ.
[37]Putnam，R.D.（1996），“The Prosperous community：Social Capital and Public Life”，The American Pros pect，13，pp.35‐42.
[38]Putman，R.D.（2000），Bowling alone：Thecolla pse and revival of Ameri-can community.NY：Simon&Schus ter.
[39]Rosalyn Harper&Maryanne Kelly.（2003）.“Measuring Social Capital in the United Kingdom.”National Statistics，www.statistics.gov.uk/social‐capital.
[40]Walther，J.B.，Van Der Heide，B.，Kim，S.Y.，&Westerman，D.（in press）.The role of friends'appearance and behavior on evaluations of indi-viduals on Facebook：Are we known by the company we keep？Human communication Research.
[41]Wellman，B.，Haase，A.Q.，Witte，J.，&Hampton，K.（2001）.“Does the Internet increase，decrease，or supplement social capital？Social networks，partici-pation，and community commitment”.American Behavioral Scientist，45（3），436.
The Online‐Social Capital Acquired of Social Network Site Users：Take the Student Users for Example
Song Qingqing
Abstract：This paper examines the relationship between the use of Social Network Sites and the formation and maintance of social cap-ital with the use and gratification theory and social capital theory。In this paper，we inspect how the initiative of individuals，s tructural features，the external environment and institutional factors of the SNS users influences the formation and maintenance of social capital，then build the Model of Personal Social Capital‐acquired in Social Network Sites.The results show that the traditional social status of individuals was weakened by the structural advantages of the offline society，and the influence of“off the center”is still affects in the so-cial network sites.The main purpose of use of the SNS users is to maintain the existing ties with the offline friends，instead of forming new ones.
They often engage in“searching”for people with whom they have an offline connection more than they“browse”for com-plete strangers to meet.The study suggests that the need for affilication positively associated with the intensity of SNS use，and the fear of rejections negatively associated with the preference of SNS interaction.Regression analyses conducted on results from a survery of undergraduate students（N=484）suggest a strong association between use of SNS and the two types of social capital，the preference of SNS interaction is the main predictor of both bridging social capital and bonding social capital，but the intensity of SNS use just predicted the bridging social capital.In addition，the people with better interper-sonal communication skills can get social capital easier，and the fe-male more accessible than man to bonding social capital.
Keywords：Social Network Sites，Social Capital，Use and Gratificati
