This offence is so obvious to us educated people who have lived in countries where various religions are professed and have seen the contempt,self-assurance,and invincible contradiction with which Catholics behave to the Orthodox Greeks and to the Protestants,and the Orthodox to Catholics and Protestants,and the Protestants to the two others,and the similar attitude of Old-Believers,Pashkovites (Russian Evangelicals),Shakers,and all religions--that the very obviousness of the temptation at first perplexes us.One says to oneself:it is impossible that it is so simple and that people do not see that if two assertions are mutually contradictory,then neither of them has the sole truth which faith should possess.There is something else here,there must be some explanation.I thought there was,and sought that explanation and read all I could on the subject,and consulted all whom I could.And no one gave me any explanation,except the one which causes the Sumsky Hussars to consider the Sumsky Hussars the best regiment in the world,and the Yellow Uhlans to consider that the best regiment in the world is the Yellow Uhlans.The ecclesiastics of all the different creeds,through their best representatives,told me nothing but that they believed themselves to have the truth and the others to be in error,and that all they could do was to pray for them.I went to archimandrites,bishops,elders,monks of the strictest orders,and asked them;but none of them made any attempt to explain the matter to me except one man,who explained it all and explained it so that I never asked any one any more about it.I said that for every unbeliever turning to a belief (and all our young generation are in a position to do so)the question that presents itself first is,why is truth not in Lutheranism nor in Catholicism,but in Orthodoxy?Educated in the high school he cannot help knowing what the peasants do not know--that the Protestants and Catholics equally affirm that their faith is the only true one.Historical evidence,twisted by each religion in its own favour,is insufficient.Is it not possible,said I,to understand the teaching in a loftier way,so that from its height the differences should disappear,as they do for one who believes truly?Can we not go further along a path like the one we are following with the Old-Believers?They emphasize the fact that they have a differently shaped cross and different alleluias and a different procession round the altar.We reply:You believe in the Nicene Creed,in the seven sacraments,and so do we.Let us hold to that,and in other matters do as you pease.We have united with them by placing the essentials of faith above the unessentials.Now with the Catholics can we not say:You believe in so and so and in so and so,which are the chief things,and as for the Filioque clause and the Pope--do as you please.Can we not say the same to the Protestants,uniting with them in what is most important?
My interlocutor agreed with my thoughts,but told me that such conceptions would bring reproach o the spiritual authorities for deserting the faith of our forefathers,and this would produce a schism;and the vocation of the spiritual authorities is to safeguard in all its purity the Greco-Russian Orthodox faith inherited from our forefathers.
And I understood it all.I am seeking a faith,the power of life;and they are seeking the best way to fulfil in the eyes of men certain human obligations.and fulfilling these human affairs they fulfil them in a human way.However much they may talk of their pity for their erring brethren,and of addressing prayers for them to the throne of the Almighty--to carry out human purposes violence is necessary,and it has always been applied and is and will be applied.If of two religions each considers itself true and the other false,then men desiring to attract others to the truth will preach their own doctrine.And if a false teaching is preached to the inexperienced sons of their Church--which as the truth--then that Church cannot but burn the books and remove the man who is misleading its sons.What is to be done with a sectarian--burning,in the opinion of the Orthodox,with the fire of false doctrine--who in the most important affair of life,in faith,misleads the sons of the Church?What can be done with him except to cut off his head or to incarcerate him?Under the Tsar Alexis Mikhaylovich people were burned at the stake,that is to say,the severest method of punishment of the time was applied,and in our day also the severest method of punishment is applied--detention in solitary confinement.[Footnote:At the time this was written capital punishment was considered to be abolished in Russia.--A.M.]
The second relation of the Church to a question of life was with regard to war and executions.
At that time Russia was at war.And Russians,in the name of Christian love,began to kill their fellow men.It was impossible not to think about this,and not to see that killing is an evil repugnant to the first principles of any faith.Yet prayers were said in the churches for the success of our arms,and the teachers of the Faith acknowledged killing to be an act resulting from the Faith.And besides the murders during the war,I saw,during the disturbances which followed the war,Church dignitaries and teachers and monks of the lesser and stricter orders who approved the killing of helpless,erring youths.And I took note of all that is done by men who profess Christianity,and I was horrified.
