登陆注册
5593900000259

第259章

The principle is, that either at the beginning, or ultimately, such questions shall or may be decided by the national tribunals. If in any suit properly cognizable in a State court the decision should turn on a clause in the Constitution, or on a law of the United States, or on the act of a national offense, or on the validity of a national act, an appeal lies to the Supreme Court of the United States and to its officers. The object has been to give to the national tribunals of the nation full cognizance of its own laws, treaties, and congressional acts.

The judges of all the national tribunals, of whatever grade or rank, hold their offices for life, and are removable only on impeachment.

They are not even removable on an address of Congress; thus holding on a firmer tenure even than our own judges, who may, I believe, be moved on an address by Parliament. The judges in America are not entitled to any pension or retiring allowances; and as there is not, as regards the judges of the national courts, any proviso that they shall cease to sit after a certain age, they are in fact immovable whatever may be their infirmities. Their position in this respect is not good, seeing that their salaries will hardly admit of their making adequate provision for the evening of life. The salary of the Chief Justice of the United States is only 1300l. per annum.

All judges of the national courts, of whatever rank, are appointed by the President, but their appointments must be confirmed by the Senate. This proviso, however, gives to the Senate practically but little power, and is rarely used in opposition to the will of the President. If the President name one candidate, who on political grounds is distasteful to a majority of the Senate, it is not probable that a second nomination made by him will be more satisfactory. This seems now to be understood, and the nomination of the cabinet ministers and of the judges, as made by the President, are seldom set aside or interfered with by the Senate, unless on grounds of purely personal objection.

The position of the national judges as to their appointments and mode of tenure is very different from that of the State judges, to whom in a few lines I shall more specially allude. This should, Ithink, be specially noticed by Englishmen when criticising the doings of the American courts. I have observed statements made to the effect that decisions given by American judges as to international or maritime affairs affecting English interests could not be trusted, because the judges so giving them would have been elected by popular vote, and would be dependent on the popular voice for reappointment. This is not so. Judges are appointed by popular vote in very many of the States. But all matters affecting shipping and all questions touching foreigners are tried in the national courts before judges who have been appointed for life. I should not myself have had any fear with reference to the ultimate decision in the affair of Slidell and Mason had the "Trent" been carried into New York. I would, however, by no means say so much had the cause been one for trial before the tribunals of the State of New York.

I have been told that we in England have occasionally fallen into the error of attributing to the Supreme Court at Washington a quasi political power which it does not possess. This court can give no opinion to any department of the government, nor can it decide upon or influence any subject that has not come before it as a regularly litigated case in law. Though especially founded by the Constitution, it has no peculiar power under the Constitution, and stands in no peculiar relation either to that or to acts of Congress. It has no other power to decide on the constitutional legality of an act of Congress or an act of a State legislature, or of a public officer, than every court, State and National, high and low, possesses and is bound to exercise. It is simply the national court of last appeal.

In the different States such tribunals have been established as each State by its constitution and legislation has seen fit to adopt.

同类推荐
  • 张协状元

    张协状元

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 养一斋李杜诗话

    养一斋李杜诗话

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • The Chignecto Isthmus And Its First Settlers

    The Chignecto Isthmus And Its First Settlers

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 孔雀东南飞

    孔雀东南飞

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • Sister Carrie

    Sister Carrie

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
热门推荐
  • 平民逆袭冰山女王你最大

    平民逆袭冰山女王你最大

    【苏苏苏!甜甜甜!】 接了自家垃圾老爸的一个电话,凌渝悠马不停蹄地飞回国内,结果垃圾老爸屁事没有,只是叫自己去联姻!行吧,她倒要看看自己的便宜未婚夫是何方神圣。 结果面瘫男秒变小奶狗,烦不胜烦!“慕容绯!你好烦!”“老婆,我只烦你。”“...........”谁来把这妖孽打包带走?/后期超好看/骗人我是猪/
  • 星堕诗

    星堕诗

    星座都不是骗人的吗?不可一世的神堕落了还可以再次回去吗。
  • 永远的怀念:我们心中的季羡林先生

    永远的怀念:我们心中的季羡林先生

    季羡林先生是北京大学东方语言文学学科的开创者,也是中国东方文学、东方学研究的奠基人和开创者之一。先生一生著述丰赡,学术经历极其丰富。大半个世纪以来,他身体力行,做出楷模,被公认为中国的东方学、东方文学以及相关的其他一些研究领域中成就最大,资历最高,影响最广,最具有世界性眼光的学术带头人。先生走了,先生不会再回来。我中心悲伤。只是突然又想起先生经常提到的陶渊明的一段诗句:“纵浪大化中,不喜亦不惧。应尽便须尽,无复独多虑。”这一段诗,先生说,他一直很喜欢。先生自己,也常常吟咏。如果是这样,先生也许走得是安心的。
  • 异世之潇洒大帝

    异世之潇洒大帝

    在斗气与体术修炼的社会里,修炼的主角一直是专精一脉并将其发挥至巅峰者,直到一个猛虎少年无意中捡到一节指骨,自此两种修炼开始变得密不可分,斗体大陆的历史就此被改变,且看一代天帝如何笑傲苍穹。
  • TFBOYS之星河

    TFBOYS之星河

    踏遍星河来到你的身边,穿过人海站在你的面前。我喜欢你。
  • 太真玉帝四极明科经

    太真玉帝四极明科经

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 好太太美食

    好太太美食

    “要想抓住男人的心,首先要抓住男人的胃。”身为一名好太太,一手色香味俱全的佳肴是必须掌握的。“三日入厨下,洗手作羹汤。未谙姑食性,先遣小姑尝。”掌握了一手让人垂涎欲滴的厨艺更是轻松调和家庭关系的便捷方法。好太太怎么可以少了一手好厨艺呢!
  • 静谧双眼

    静谧双眼

    “你失去了视觉,亦失去了听觉。”命运这样告诉陆曦衣。他安静的接受了,同时却也因此也“看”到了更多。当虚空中的隐秘组织将他送到了一个全新的、奇幻又布满神秘的广阔大陆上作“探索者”时,他安静的接受了,因为:这腐朽的躯壳,这混浊的灵魂,束缚他太久,太久了。长夜将至,静谧来袭。
  • The Dragon of Cripple Creek
  • 我与我的故事

    我与我的故事

    新书《互联网女子图鉴》连载开始!请多多支持!交流可加:883033761相传人类的灵魂在配装到身体之前会被一分为二,分开的两个灵魂之间会有一条看不见的红线相连接。就算相距千山万水,这对分开的灵魂始终会在红线的牵引下走到一起。本文的两个主角即使远隔千里也会排除万难坚定不移的走到一起,完成自己的梦想。