Since the world is developed in time,or change,the perfection of the faculty that places men in relation with the world will necessarily be the greatest possible mutability and extensiveness.Since personality is permanence in change,the perfection of this faculty,which must be opposed to change,will be the greatest possible freedom of action (autonomy)and intensity.The more the receptivity is developed under manifold aspects,the more it is movable and offers surfaces to phaenomena,the larger is the part of the world seized upon by man,and the more virtualities he develops in himself.Again,in proportion as man gains strength and depth,and depth and reason gain in freedom,in that proportion man takes in a larger share of the world,and throws out forms outside himself.Therefore his culture will consist,first,in placing his receptivity on contact with the world in the greatest number of points possible,and in raising passivity to the highest exponent on the side of feeling;secondly,in procuring for the determining faculty the greatest possible amount of independence,in relation to the receptive power,and in raising activity to the highest degree on the side of reason.By the union of these two qualities man will associate the highest degree of self-spontaneity (autonomy)and of freedom with the fullest plenitude of existence and instead of abandoning himself to the world so as to get lost in it,he will rather absorb it in himself,with all the infinitude of its phaenomena,and subject it to the unity of his reason.
But man can invert this relation,and thus fail in attaining his destination in two ways.He can hand over to the passive force the intensity demanded by the active force;he can encroach by material impulsion on the formal impulsion,and convert the receptive into the determining power.He can attribute to the active force the extensiveness belonging to the passive force,he can encroach by the formal impulsion on the material impulsion,and substitute the determining for the receptive power.In the former case,he will never be an Ego,a personality;in the second case,he will never be a Non-Ego,and hence in both cases he will be neither the one nor the other,consequently he will be nothing.
In fact,if the sensuous impulsion becomes determining,if the senses become law-givers,and if the world stifles personality,he loses as object what he gains in force.It may be said of man that when he is only the contents of time,he is not and consequently he has no other contents.
His condition is destroyed at the same time as his personality,because these are two correlative ideas,because change presupposes permanence,and a limited reality implies an infinite reality.If the formal impulsion becomes receptive,that is,if thought anticipates sensation,and the person substitutes itself in the place of the world,it loses as a subject and autonomous force what it gains as object,because immutability implies change,and that to manifest itself also absolute reality requires limits.
As soon as man is only form,he has no form,and the personality vanishes with the condition.In a word,it is only inasmuch as he is spontaneous,autonomous,that there is reality out of him,that he is also receptive;and it is only inasmuch as he is receptive that there is reality in him that he is a thinking force.
Consequently these two impulsions require limits,and looked upon as forces,they need tempering;the former that it may not encroach on the field of legislation,the latter that it may not invade the ground of feeling.
But this tempering and moderating the sensuous impulsion ought not to be the effect of physical impotence or of a blunting of sensations,which is always a matter for contempt.It must be a free act,an activity of the person,which by its moral intensity moderates the sensuous intensity,and by the sway of impressions takes from them in depth what it gives them in surface or breadth.The character must place limits to temperament,for the senses have only the right to lose elements if it be to the advantage of the mind.In its turn,the tempering of the formal impulsion must not result from moral impotence,from a relaxation of thought and will,which would degrade humanity.It is necessary that the glorious source of this second tempering should be the fullness of sensations;it is necessary that sensuousness itself should defend its field with a victorious arm and resist the violence that the invading activity of the mind would do to it.In a word,it is necessary that the material impulsion should be contained in the limits of propriety by personality,and the formal impulsion by receptivity or nature.
