Since all the ways heretofore taken have failed to attain the goal, and since without a preceding critique of pure reason it is not likely ever to be attained, the present essay now before the public has a fair title to an accurate and careful investigation, except it be thought more advisable to give up all pretensions to metaphysics, to which, if men but would consistently adhere to their purpose, no objection can be made. If we take the course of things as it is, not as it ought to be, there are two sorts of judgments: (1) one a judgment which precedes investigation (in our case one in which the reader from his own metaphysics pronounces judgment on the Critique of Pure Reason which was intended to discuss the very possibility of metaphysics); (2) the other a judgment subsequent to investigation. In the latter the reader is enabled to waive for awhile the consequences of the critical researches that may be repugnant to his formerly adopted metaphysics, and first examines the grounds whence those consequences are derived. If what common metaphysics propounds were demonstrably certain, as for instance the theorems of geometry, the former way of judging would bold good. For if the consequences of certain principles are repugnant to established truths, these principles are false and without further inquiry to be repudiated. But if metaphysics does not possess a stock of indisputably certain (synthetical) propositions, and should it even be the case that there are a number of them, which, though among the most specious, are by their consequences in mutual collision, and if no sure criterion of the truth of peculiarly metaphysical (synthetical) propositions is to be met with in it, then the former way of judging is not admissible, but the investigation of the principles of the critique must precede all judgments as to its value. On A Specimen Of A Judgment Of The Critique Prior To Its Examination. This judgment is to be found in the Gottingischen gelehrten Anzeigen, in the supplement to the third division, of January 19, 1782, pages 40 et seq. When an author who is familiar with the subject of his work and endeavors to present his independent reflections in its elaboration, falls into the hands of a reviewer who in his turn, is keen enough to discern the points on which the worth or worthlessness of the book rests, who does not cling to words, but goes to the heart of the subject, sifting and testing more than the mere principles which the author takes as his point of departure, the severity of the judgment may indeed displease the latter, but the public does not care, as it gains thereby; and the author himself may be contented, as an opportunity of correcting or explaining his positions is afforded to him at an early date by the examination of a competent judge, in such a manner, that if he believes himself fundamentally right, he can remove in time any stone of offense that might hurt the success of his work. I find myself, with my reviewer, in quite another position. He seems not to see at all the real matter of the investigation with which (successfully or unsuccessfully) I have been occupied. It is either impatience at thinking out a lengthy work, or vexation at a threatened reform of a science in which he believed he had brought everything to perfection long ago, or, what I am unwilling to imagine, real narrow-mindedness, that prevents him from ever carrying his thoughts beyond his school-metaphysics. In short, he passes impatiently in review a long series of propositions, by which, without knowing their premises, we can think nothing, intersperses here and there his censure, the reason of which the reader understands just as little as the propositions against which it is directed; and hence [his report] can neither serve the public nor damage me, in the judgment of experts. I should, for these reasons, have passed over this judgment altogether, were it not that it may afford me occasion for some explanations which may in some cases save the readers of these Prolegomena from a misconception. In order to take a position from which my reviewer could most easily set the whole work in a most unfavorable light, without venturing to trouble himself with any special investigation, he begins and ends by saying: "This work is a system of transcendent (or, as he translates it, of higher) Idealism." 42 A glance at this line soon showed me the sort of criticism that I had to expect, much as though the reviewer were one who had never seen or heard of geometry, having found a Euclid, and coming upon various figures in turning over its leaves, were to say, on being asked his opinion of it:
同类推荐
热门推荐
绝天傲寒
当没爹疼没娘护,懦弱无能却一身秘密的明月国第一废物,迎来一个强悍腹黑的灵魂,顿时勇猛嚣张,锋芒必露,风华绝代!谁敢说她废物,杀不死你玩死你!敢欺我的亲人,玩的你死去活来!敢打我的兽兽、死,死,死!!!!!敢掳我的父母,搞的你天翻地覆,日月无光!搅世家,闯幻兽森林,助国难,平四方,再创世!女主性格多变,时冷酷,时腹黑,时狠辣,时温情,欺她之人整死、杀死!护她之人,她愿为其逆天而行,你敬我一尺我敬你一丈,你还我一尺,我打你九天之外!★我靠,秒升两级,变态的不是人。闯森林带了只幻兽回来,一直盼着契主死亡恢复自由的幻兽,反过来厚脸皮强行契约。敢算计她!这得教训啊!摸着下巴,冷冷一笑:“你敢在我不承认的情况下契约,你被抛弃了!”“呜呜呜。”某兽顿时泪流满面,睁着大眼睛,装可爱求原谅。★“交出来。”“交……交什么……”唔唔,本想抢劫竟然踢到铁板了。“货。”“……”“其实我这个人很随和,一般不轻易和人动手,不过动手不收点汗水钱是不行的,一般人我收1000金币,你们三人我就打个折后价4000金币吧。”数了数金币,“早给不就完了,我这人这么好说话,也不会为难你们。”所有人石化!看强大、腹黑、英勇无比的女主,如何在异世混的风生水起,世人崇拜。爱亲人、爱朋友、爱爱人、欺敌人与恶霸势力,对内护短对外强悍,独一无二唯有凌宇寒是也!收藏收藏,喜欢的收藏吧~神偷毒医,误惹腹黑帝君
表面上,他们——一个是,被家族舍弃的花痴草包小废材。另个是,中毒身体孱弱的花美男七殿下。而实际上,他们——她,来自二十一世纪的王牌特工神偷,萝莉般的天真软糯外表,实则睚眦必报,狠绝无双!最擅长扮猪吃老虎,琴棋书画样样不会,坑蒙拐骗件件在行。而他,是腹黑狡诈的尊贵殿下,更是抬手间天地为之变色的绝世强者。至于为何非要把自己搞成这样子,他的回答是……白小怜发誓,自己真的只是想坑点钱!谁曾想,唯一一次失手,竟把她整个人都搭进去了!此后,被某男日夜啃噬,连渣渣都不剩……情节虚构,请勿模仿